Ghana curriculum lesson note
SHS 3 Management in Living 1st Semester Week 12 Lesson Plan
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
| Weekly Learning Plan | |||
| Subject | Management in Living | Week | 12 |
| Duration | 60 minutes | Form | SHS 3 |
| Strand | Personal and Family Resource Management | Sub-Strand | Creative Product Development and Entrepreneurship |
| Learning Outcome(s) | 3.1.3.LO.1 - Demonstrate understanding and practical application of Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application within the curriculum sub-strand Creative Product Development and Entrepreneurship. | ||
| Learning Indicator(s) | 3.1.3.LI.1 - Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing | ||
| Lesson Focus | Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing | ||
| Previous Knowledge | Learners recall the immediately preceding knowledge/skill needed to engage with Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application; the starter diagnoses this rather than assuming mastery. | ||
| Lesson Objective(s) | Identify or explain the key subject idea/procedure in Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application. Complete the concrete guided/practical task for Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application accurately. Apply Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application independently to a new case, data set, text, material or performance situation. | ||
| Essential Question(s) | What evidence or procedure is needed to work accurately with Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application? What would a strong practical/application response to Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application look like? How would changing the context, data or constraints affect a decision about Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application? | ||
| Pedagogical Strategies | Diagnostic questioning Experiential/problem-based learning Collaborative analysis Guided modelling Independent application Peer/self assessment | ||
| Teaching & Learning Resources | Needs-survey cards Locally available materials Prototype evaluation checklist Costing/pricing sheet | ||
| Key Notes on Differentiation | |||
| Content | Provide a partially completed example, labelled materials or vocabulary support for learners who need scaffolding in Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application. Extend the task by adding a new constraint, less familiar case or requirement to compare alternatives in Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application. | ||
| Process | Use mixed-ability pairs for the first application, then require an individual transfer task. Allow oral/visual demonstration where appropriate while retaining the same subject accuracy criteria. | ||
| Product | Use a checklist/rubric tied to the concrete output for this week rather than participation alone. For advanced work, require justification with evidence, calculations, source reference or quality criteria. | ||
| Success Criteria | The learner uses correct subject terminology and evidence. The learner completes the week’s concrete product/calculation/performance with acceptable accuracy. The learner explains why the procedure/choice fits the stated context rather than giving a memorised general answer. | ||
| Homework | Apply Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application to a home/community situation using a small data table, photo, receipt, timetable or observation record; submit the evidence and recommendation. | ||
| Lesson Activities | |||
| Stage | Teacher Activity | Learner Activity | Assessment / DoK |
| Starter10 minutes | Present an unseen case/material set for Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application using Needs-survey cards; do not model the solution. Ask learners to identify the first decision, calculation, language feature or practical step. | Inspect the prompt/materials, record an initial response about Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application, and justify it briefly. | Not provided. |
| Activity 115 minutes | Give fresh data/materials for Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application and require learners to complete the subject-specific task without a worked example. | Sketch or make a low-cost prototype, then test it against function, safety, cost, appearance and user-feedback criteria. Use the fresh case/materials and show all evidence, workings or process decisions. | Check independent transfer: correct method/technique, use of evidence and completeness of the concrete output. |
| Activity 220 minutes | Have pairs exchange outputs for Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application; provide a quality-control checklist tied to the actual product/calculation/performance and require evidence-based corrections. | Prepare a simple cost/price/label or sales pitch for the product and revise it after peer customer feedback. Then peer-audit another output, identify one precise defect/error and propose a correction. | Score both the original output and the accuracy of the peer correction against the subject checklist. |
| Activity 310 minutes | Present one deliberately flawed example related to Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application; require each learner to locate the defect and produce the corrected version. | Identify the exact error/weakness in the flawed Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application example, correct it and write one sentence explaining why the correction is valid. | Check that the learner corrects the actual defect rather than merely rewriting the example. |
| Lesson Closure | Compare the model criteria with the errors found in the unseen Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application task; highlight the one quality check learners should carry into future work. Complete a one-minute exit response using a concrete example from the lesson on Refining a product from user feedback and quality testing — household/community application. | ||
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
More SHS 3 Management in Living 1st Semester Lessons
Week 1Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 2Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 3Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 4Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 5Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 6Sub-strand: Resource Management PracticesWeek 7Sub-strand: Management Principles for Quality LivingWeek 8Sub-strand: Management Principles for Quality LivingWeek 9Sub-strand: Management Principles for Quality LivingWeek 10Sub-strand: Management Principles for Quality LivingWeek 11Sub-strand: Creative Product Development and EntrepreneurshipWeek 12 (current)Week 13Sub-strand: Creative Product Development and EntrepreneurshipWeek 14Sub-strand: Creative Product Development and EntrepreneurshipWeek 15Sub-strand: Creative Product Development and EntrepreneurshipWeek 16Sub-strand: Creative Product Development and Entrepreneurship