Ghana curriculum lesson note
SHS 3 Christian Religious Studies 2nd Semester Week 16 Lesson Plan
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
| Weekly Learning Plan | |||
| Subject | Christian Religious Studies | Week | 16 |
| Duration | 60 minutes | Form | SHS 3 |
| Strand | Religion and Contemporary Issues | Sub-Strand | Religion and Fraud |
| Learning Outcome(s) | 3.4.3.LO.1 - Demonstrate understanding and practical application of Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application within the curriculum sub-strand Religion and Fraud. | ||
| Learning Indicator(s) | 3.4.3.LI.5 - Integrity campaign/project for school or community | ||
| Lesson Focus | Integrity campaign/project for school or community | ||
| Previous Knowledge | Learners recall the immediately preceding knowledge/skill needed to engage with Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application; the starter diagnoses this rather than assuming mastery. | ||
| Lesson Objective(s) | Identify or explain the key subject idea/procedure in Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application. Complete the concrete guided/practical task for Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application accurately. Apply Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application independently to a new case, data set, text, material or performance situation. | ||
| Essential Question(s) | What evidence or procedure is needed to work accurately with Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application? What would a strong practical/application response to Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application look like? How would changing the context, data or constraints affect a decision about Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application? | ||
| Pedagogical Strategies | Diagnostic questioning Experiential/problem-based learning Collaborative analysis Guided modelling Independent application Peer/self assessment | ||
| Teaching & Learning Resources | Selected Bible references Fraud/integrity scenario cards Impact-response matrix Poster/procedure template | ||
| Key Notes on Differentiation | |||
| Content | Provide a partially completed example, labelled materials or vocabulary support for learners who need scaffolding in Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application. Extend the task by adding a new constraint, less familiar case or requirement to compare alternatives in Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application. | ||
| Process | Use mixed-ability pairs for the first application, then require an individual transfer task. Allow oral/visual demonstration where appropriate while retaining the same subject accuracy criteria. | ||
| Product | Use a checklist/rubric tied to the concrete output for this week rather than participation alone. For advanced work, require justification with evidence, calculations, source reference or quality criteria. | ||
| Success Criteria | The learner uses correct subject terminology and evidence. The learner completes the week’s concrete product/calculation/performance with acceptable accuracy. The learner explains why the procedure/choice fits the stated context rather than giving a memorised general answer. | ||
| Homework | Write a short case response on Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application: identify the issue, state one relevant Christian principle and propose a practical action with justification. | ||
| Lesson Activities | |||
| Stage | Teacher Activity | Learner Activity | Assessment / DoK |
| Starter10 minutes | Present an unseen case/material set for Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application using Selected Bible references; do not model the solution. Ask learners to identify the first decision, calculation, language feature or practical step. | Inspect the prompt/materials, record an initial response about Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application, and justify it briefly. | Not provided. |
| Activity 115 minutes | Give fresh data/materials for Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application and require learners to complete the subject-specific task without a worked example. | Use selected Bible references and civic consequences to build a response matrix: harm, affected people, moral principle, prevention, accountability/restitution. Use the fresh case/materials and show all evidence, workings or process decisions. | Check independent transfer: correct method/technique, use of evidence and completeness of the concrete output. |
| Activity 220 minutes | Have pairs exchange outputs for Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application; provide a quality-control checklist tied to the actual product/calculation/performance and require evidence-based corrections. | Create a short integrity message or reporting/prevention procedure for one school/community fraud risk, avoiding accusations about real persons. Then peer-audit another output, identify one precise defect/error and propose a correction. | Score both the original output and the accuracy of the peer correction against the subject checklist. |
| Activity 310 minutes | Present one deliberately flawed example related to Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application; require each learner to locate the defect and produce the corrected version. | Identify the exact error/weakness in the flawed Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application example, correct it and write one sentence explaining why the correction is valid. | Check that the learner corrects the actual defect rather than merely rewriting the example. |
| Lesson Closure | Compare the model criteria with the errors found in the unseen Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application task; highlight the one quality check learners should carry into future work. Complete a one-minute exit response using a concrete example from the lesson on Integrity campaign/project for school or community — source-based ethical/community application. | ||
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
More SHS 3 Christian Religious Studies 2nd Semester Lessons
Week 1Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 2Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 3Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 4Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 5Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 6Sub-strand: Religious Communities, Gender and DevelopmentWeek 7Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 8Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 9Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 10Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 11Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 12Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 13Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 14Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 15Sub-strand: Religion and FraudWeek 16 (current)