Ghana curriculum lesson note

SHS 3 Christian Religious Studies 2nd Semester Week 13 Lesson Plan

Create your lesson notes your way

Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.

Weekly Learning Plan
SubjectChristian Religious StudiesWeek13
Duration60 minutesFormSHS 3
StrandReligion and Contemporary IssuesSub-StrandReligion and Fraud
Learning Outcome(s)3.4.3.LO.1 - Demonstrate understanding and practical application of Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability within the curriculum sub-strand Religion and Fraud.
Learning Indicator(s)3.4.3.LI.4 - Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability
Lesson FocusChristian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability
Previous KnowledgeLearners recall the immediately preceding knowledge/skill needed to engage with Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability; the starter diagnoses this rather than assuming mastery.
Lesson Objective(s)Identify or explain the key subject idea/procedure in Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability. Complete the concrete guided/practical task for Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability accurately. Apply Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability independently to a new case, data set, text, material or performance situation.
Essential Question(s)What evidence or procedure is needed to work accurately with Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability? What would a strong practical/application response to Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability look like? How would changing the context, data or constraints affect a decision about Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability?
Pedagogical StrategiesDiagnostic questioning Experiential/problem-based learning Collaborative analysis Guided modelling Independent application Peer/self assessment
Teaching & Learning ResourcesSelected Bible references Fraud/integrity scenario cards Impact-response matrix Poster/procedure template
Key Notes on Differentiation
ContentProvide a partially completed example, labelled materials or vocabulary support for learners who need scaffolding in Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability. Extend the task by adding a new constraint, less familiar case or requirement to compare alternatives in Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability.
ProcessUse mixed-ability pairs for the first application, then require an individual transfer task. Allow oral/visual demonstration where appropriate while retaining the same subject accuracy criteria.
ProductUse a checklist/rubric tied to the concrete output for this week rather than participation alone. For advanced work, require justification with evidence, calculations, source reference or quality criteria.
Success CriteriaThe learner uses correct subject terminology and evidence. The learner completes the week’s concrete product/calculation/performance with acceptable accuracy. The learner explains why the procedure/choice fits the stated context rather than giving a memorised general answer.
HomeworkWrite a short case response on Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability: identify the issue, state one relevant Christian principle and propose a practical action with justification.
Lesson Activities
StageTeacher ActivityLearner ActivityAssessment / DoK
Starter10 minutesPresent a short, respectful case or selected Bible reference connected to Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability; ask learners what question the case raises for belief and conduct.Inspect the prompt/materials, record an initial response about Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability, and justify it briefly.Not provided.
Activity 115 minutesGuide close reading/analysis of selected Bible references and curriculum concepts for Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability; avoid relying on unsupported opinion or long quotation.Classify school/work/digital/public-life scenarios as honest conduct, conflict of interest, deception, theft/fraud or corruption and explain the evidence.Check accurate identification of the relevant belief/value/source and respectful use of terminology.
Activity 220 minutesLearners apply Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability to a realistic ethical, historical, community or development case and support their reasoning with relevant Christian principles.Use selected Bible references and civic consequences to build a response matrix: harm, affected people, moral principle, prevention, accountability/restitution.Assess reasoning, relevance of the faith principle, awareness of consequences and respect for diversity.
Activity 310 minutesEach learner gives an individual reasoned response to a new case or source question on Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability.Create a short integrity message or reporting/prevention procedure for one school/community fraud risk, avoiding accusations about real persons.Check whether the response applies rather than merely repeats a belief statement.
Lesson ClosureAsk learners to distinguish one belief/principle learned in Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability from the concrete behaviour it should influence. Complete a one-minute exit response using a concrete example from the lesson on Christian responses to corruption, restitution and accountability.

Create your lesson notes your way

Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.

More SHS 3 Christian Religious Studies 2nd Semester Lessons