Ghana curriculum lesson note
SHS 3 Ghanaian Language 2nd Semester Week 16 Lesson Plan
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
| Weekly Learning Plan | |||
| Subject | Ghanaian Language | Week | 16 |
| Duration | 60 minutes | Form | SHS 3 |
| Strand | Literature of the Ghanaian Language | Sub-Strand | Written Literature |
| Learning Outcome(s) | 3.4.2.LO.1 - Demonstrate understanding and practical application of Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application within the curriculum sub-strand Written Literature. | ||
| Learning Indicator(s) | 3.4.2.LI.2 - Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation | ||
| Lesson Focus | Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation | ||
| Previous Knowledge | Learners recall the immediately preceding knowledge/skill needed to engage with Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application; the starter diagnoses this rather than assuming mastery. | ||
| Lesson Objective(s) | Identify or explain the key subject idea/procedure in Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application. Complete the concrete guided/practical task for Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application accurately. Apply Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application independently to a new case, data set, text, material or performance situation. | ||
| Essential Question(s) | What evidence or procedure is needed to work accurately with Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application? What would a strong practical/application response to Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application look like? How would changing the context, data or constraints affect a decision about Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application? | ||
| Pedagogical Strategies | Diagnostic questioning Experiential/problem-based learning Collaborative analysis Guided modelling Independent application Peer/self assessment | ||
| Teaching & Learning Resources | Teacher-provided short literary extract Literary response chart Performance cue cards Notebook | ||
| Key Notes on Differentiation | |||
| Content | Provide a partially completed example, labelled materials or vocabulary support for learners who need scaffolding in Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application. Extend the task by adding a new constraint, less familiar case or requirement to compare alternatives in Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application. | ||
| Process | Use mixed-ability pairs for the first application, then require an individual transfer task. Allow oral/visual demonstration where appropriate while retaining the same subject accuracy criteria. | ||
| Product | Use a checklist/rubric tied to the concrete output for this week rather than participation alone. For advanced work, require justification with evidence, calculations, source reference or quality criteria. | ||
| Success Criteria | The learner uses correct subject terminology and evidence. The learner completes the week’s concrete product/calculation/performance with acceptable accuracy. The learner explains why the procedure/choice fits the stated context rather than giving a memorised general answer. | ||
| Homework | Collect or create a short example of Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application in the selected Ghanaian language and annotate the feature being studied. | ||
| Lesson Activities | |||
| Stage | Teacher Activity | Learner Activity | Assessment / DoK |
| Starter10 minutes | Present an unseen case/material set for Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application using Teacher-provided short literary extract; do not model the solution. Ask learners to identify the first decision, calculation, language feature or practical step. | Inspect the prompt/materials, record an initial response about Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application, and justify it briefly. | Not provided. |
| Activity 115 minutes | Give fresh data/materials for Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application and require learners to complete the subject-specific task without a worked example. | Annotate theme, character/speaker, imagery/proverb/style and cultural value, supporting each point with a short textual reference. Use the fresh case/materials and show all evidence, workings or process decisions. | Check independent transfer: correct method/technique, use of evidence and completeness of the concrete output. |
| Activity 220 minutes | Have pairs exchange outputs for Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application; provide a quality-control checklist tied to the actual product/calculation/performance and require evidence-based corrections. | Create a response: retell, dramatic performance, proverb application or comparative paragraph linking the text to a contemporary issue. Then peer-audit another output, identify one precise defect/error and propose a correction. | Score both the original output and the accuracy of the peer correction against the subject checklist. |
| Activity 310 minutes | Present one deliberately flawed example related to Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application; require each learner to locate the defect and produce the corrected version. | Identify the exact error/weakness in the flawed Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application example, correct it and write one sentence explaining why the correction is valid. | Check that the learner corrects the actual defect rather than merely rewriting the example. |
| Lesson Closure | Compare the model criteria with the errors found in the unseen Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application task; highlight the one quality check learners should carry into future work. Complete a one-minute exit response using a concrete example from the lesson on Literature portfolio and oral/written critical presentation — performance/production application. | ||
Create your lesson notes your way
Create, personalize and download your complete lesson notes on Sirbus.
More SHS 3 Ghanaian Language 2nd Semester Lessons
Week 1Sub-strand: Text CompositionWeek 2Sub-strand: Text CompositionWeek 3Sub-strand: Interpretation and TranslationWeek 4Sub-strand: Interpretation and TranslationWeek 5Sub-strand: Cultural PracticesWeek 6Sub-strand: Cultural PracticesWeek 7Sub-strand: Cultural PracticesWeek 8Sub-strand: Cultural PracticesWeek 9Sub-strand: Oral LiteratureWeek 10Sub-strand: Oral LiteratureWeek 11Sub-strand: Oral LiteratureWeek 12Sub-strand: Oral LiteratureWeek 13Sub-strand: Written LiteratureWeek 14Sub-strand: Written LiteratureWeek 15Sub-strand: Written LiteratureWeek 16 (current)